What States Do Not Enforce Non Compete Agreements
The majority of U.S. states recognize and enforce different forms of non-compete agreements. Some states, such as California, Montana, North Dakota and Oklahoma, prohibit non-compete agreements for employees or prohibit non-competition clauses, except in limited cases.  This is why non-competition bans are popular with companies working in states where they are licensed.  They are widespread in commercial radio stations and television channels, particularly radio personalities and television personalities working for media groups. For example, if a radio or television station ceases to be licensed or licensed by a channel in the media market where they work, they cannot work for another competing channel in the same market until their contract with their former labour chain expires.  Like other legal doctrines, conflict of laws differ from state to state. Most states will not apply laws that would be contrary to the public policy of a state with a “much greater interest” in the conflict or if the parties do not have a “substantial relationship” with the elected state. In other words, a California employer cannot circumvent the prohibition of restrictive worker alliances in California by requiring its California employees to sign an agreement containing a legal choice clause in Nevada. There are limited situations where a reasonable non-competition agreement may be valid in California.
With regard to competition restriction, each state takes a slightly different approach and non-competition bans are no exception. Non-competition clauses generally exist in the context of the idea of avoiding unfair competition between a worker and the worker`s former company for a period after the termination of the employment relationship. On the basis of these issues, the parties often contain legislation that has asked a court to apply the law of a given state in lieu of determining the physical laws of the state in force as part of a conflict of law analysis. In most cases, a court will easily accept a provision of choice of the law and apply it as the parties had intended. But this is not necessarily the case in the case of a non-competition agreement. Non-competition prohibitions permitted in the state The long-standing rule is: “A Confederation for not competing is applicable only if it is necessary to protect a legitimate commercial interest that is reasonably limited in time and space and is in the public interest.”  Update: You can read an in-depth discussion about California, non-compete clauses, choice clauses and forum selection clauses on the Antitrust Attorney blog. Unlike other legal systems that follow the general rule that the review is important only to determine whether it exists and not whether it is appropriate, Illinois will verify the adequacy of the consideration.  The majority of courts will need service employment for at least two years to support a non-competition agreement (or any other type of restrictive pact). However, in some cases where a worker is particularly severe, the courts have demanded less.
However, excessive CNC can prevent an employee from working elsewhere.